home
Spiritual Autobiography
Prepared for Dr. James MacClendon, 1981
Graduate Theological Union
This spiritual autobiography paper was written in 1981 for a
course at the GTU. I was asked to write a spiritual
autobiography, followed by a couple of pages indicating possible
areas of future study. The original was then slightly edited in
2002 before posting it on my web page. I added a couple of
retractions to the original, placed in brackets.
Spiritual Autobiography
I was born in 1942, and made my first significant breakthrough
when I was sixteen. I read several of Freud's basic works,
including Totem and Taboo, and two more volumes
concerning mistakes, errors, and dreams. At that point I began
to think critically. But critical thinking was the consequence
of a decision that I made about the age of thirteen, the
decision to start paying attention to the world around me. Until
then, I carried on an intense fantasy life, and often appeared
to my parents as if I were in a dream.
As a result of Freud I developed a theory of life which I had
worked out by the time I was nineteen. I have a younger brother,
Jack, seventeen months younger than me. We both went to the same
college, the University of the South in Sewanee, Tennessee.
While at Sewanee we frequently talked about our childhood, and
those conversations, my memory, and my observations of the world
in general, plus the impetus of Freud, provided the groundwork
for the theory.
The basic idea of this theory was that my parents, particularly
my father, had broken my spirit by the time I was about eight. I
now know there was more to it than that, but at the time, it
seemed true. The notion that my dad " broke my spirit," may seem
a bit extreme, and requires a look at my parents and our way of
life when I was a child.
My parents were from Middle Tennessee. They were raised on farms
where they worked very hard. They both went to Cumberland
College, a small college in Lebanon, Tennessee. My mother once
told me that she and dad and one other student were the smartest
students at this college, based on aptitude tests given to all
students. Both did extremely well academically, and went on to
get Master's degrees. Dad, on the basis of a national exam, went
to California Institute of Technology where he earned a Masters
in meteorology.
Their intellectual ability propelled them out into the world,
but they never abandoned certain aspects of their rural
background. There is a spirit of isolationism, extreme self
reliance, and hard work that can characterize country people. As
a result, my younger brother and I were raised in a condition of
constant grinding, physical toil. My two youngest brothers, I
was the oldest of four, escaped this work to some degree. While
very small we began washing clothes and floors. I can remember
being on my knees, washing the kitchen floor. The floor seemed
immense. We stood on chairs to do dishes, and I remember
grinding the soap made from grease, ashes, and lye. When
Richard, my second brother, was born in 1949, we were busy
snapping beans the moment Dad brought him home from the
hospital. I was seven, Jack five. When granddaddy Palmer died,
we were painting chairs when the news arrived.
In the very early days we were allowed to play a little bit, but
by the age of ten, life had become very hard. Just recently we
visited my aunt who lives in Livermore, California, and she,
shaking her head, said she had never seen children forced to
work as hard as we did.
I was born strong and aggressive. My mother used to say that she
had never seen a child as stubborn as I. In her words, I was
born with "the will to live." As a result, when I got a bit
older, I refused to go along with all the work, and other things
as well. I received innumerable spankings, and this began when I
was quite small.
Once, when I was about seven (1949), we were in the garden
hoeing. Although we lived in the city of Alexandria, Virginia,
there was a lot near our house and dad rented it from its owner.
We used it to grow a garden. The owner appeared one day as we
worked. We stopped for a moment, my dad talking to the man.
Without noticing it, I stepped on a tomato plant. Dad ordered me
to move. I did, and accidentally stepped on another. I was sent
home. From then on, I was never allowed in the garden. Dad and
Jack would go over there to work, and I would sit on the front
steps and watch, feeling absolutely wretched that I had been so
clumsy. One day we had a fire in the house. It was quite
impressive, starting in the basement. The firemen came, and
while they put it out, Jack and I sat out front watching the
crowd that had gathered across the street. There were scores of
them. Years later, when Jack and I were in college together,
Jack told me he had started the fire. We had both gotten sick
and I had gotten well before Jack did. Mom let me out, but not
Jack. He retaliated, lit the fire, and that was that. Our
parents never knew how it started.
My folks had almost no real friends. They almost never went
anywhere to visit people. Once, when I was around thirteen, we
had a family over to dinner. On another occasion, two men from
Latin America were visiting dad at work. They had dinner with us
one summer evening. We cooked hamburgers on a grill we had built
in the back lot. By then, we were living in Kansas. My folks
were alone in a strange world, far from Middle Tennessee. They
worked without stopping. They had no entertainment, no radio, no
TV, and no movies.
They were both religious. My mother was a fundamentalist, my
father a strict Presbyterian. They never smoked, cussed, drank,
lied, were unfaithful, or stole. I think they were afraid of the
world around them, its moral decadence. In 1952, when I was ten,
we moved from the city of Alexandria, Virginia to a small farm
outside of Kansas City. I think this was due to my dad's fear of
his children being raised in the corrupt city. Once there, the
work started in earnest and the isolation was maintained. We
were raised with few friends, without money, without car
privileges, and without the opportunity to be with other kids
our age after school.
I can remember only two times when I received affection from my
parents, or sensed they might love me. Once my father gave me a
hug when I waited up for him one night, and my mother once held
me after I had been electrocuted. I might have a faint memory of
playing on my father's lap, but that was too long ago. In actual
fact, I have no memory of feeling loved as a child. I do
remember, however, my parents doing things for me. For example,
my mother let us make a little "fort" out of newspapers pinned
together when Jack and I were about seven. And later, my dad
would hit us fly balls in the side lot.
From the beginning I was physically punished, slapped and
spanked. I can remember being slapped awake in the morning
because I overslept, being slapped at the dinner table, and
slapped for dropping things. One afternoon, while we were still
in Virginia, my brother Jack dropped a bottle of medicine on the
floor. It broke, splattering in all directions just as my mother
came through the door. She immediately blasted me across the
face. I said that Jack did it. "Oh," she said, turning around
and walking out. I was about seven. This and many other events
caused me to think my mother didn't love me. This caused me a
great deal of suffering as a child, until about the age of ten
when I quit agonizing over it. I simply decided she really
didn't love me, that she loved Jack more, and there was nothing
I could do about it.
In the beginning I used to go right through the whippings and
the slaps. But then, one day, around the age of five, dad went
out front to cut some switches. I remember feeling afraid. He
was going to switch me across my bare legs. After that, I became
afraid of punishment. I came to hate the fear, that I would be
so weak. After I developed the theory that my dad had broken me,
I often thought that was the turning point, the day I turned
from strength to weakness, from courage to fear.
My parents had strong wills. They would go on no matter what. To
the best of their ability, they did not deviate to the left or
the right. My father would come home from working all night at
the weather bureau, and then put in six hours hard work with us
during the day. He would be tired, ashen, but stubborn and
persistent. His chief saying was, "It's hard but its fair." Or
sometimes he would say we were "fighting the reds," the "reds"
being the communists, the great enemy of that era. Furthermore
in their own way, my folks had integrity. They treated us the
way they treated themselves, and although I consider my
childhood a wasteland in so many ways, it was no worse for me
than for them.
These difficult circumstances coupled with my stubborn,
rebellious, and sensitive nature, made my life very difficult.
From the very beginning I had trouble sleeping. I would lie in
the bed shaking from the tension. At times, I would wake up,
feeling terrible things all around me. I would fight them in the
dark. To get myself to sleep, Jack and I would sing together. My
favorite was "Home on the Range." When I was very small, about
three, I was convinced my parents were saying bad things about
me. I would sneak out of bed to listen to them. I heard nothing.
Because of the insomnia, I had trouble functioning in the
daytime.
After I read Freud, I reached the conclusion I was severely
repressed. My energy was spent shoring up a wall of resistance
against the hostility inside of me, a hostility directed toward
my father for breaking my spirit. Keeping the wall in place
required energy, and without energy, I was like a zombie. At
about the age of eleven, I began to feel as if I were looking at
the world through a plate of glass. I called it the "plate glass
feeling." It was as if I couldn't touch anything, feel things,
engage life. I only watched, noticed, observed, and analyzed,
but even that was limited. I was like a zombie, keeping the wall
in place. For that reason, I was constantly forgetting things. I
seemed dreamy, I couldn't see things right in front of me.
This condition was made worse by my mother's strict religion. At
about twelve, I quite going to church with my dad and went to my
mother's church. I couldn't understand the sermons at my dad's
church, but those at my mom's church were quite simple. God was
watching all the time, waiting for the least mistake, waiting to
send you straight to hell. Nothing was fun, no dancing, no
dating, no hanging round, no cussing, no smoking, no nothing. It
seemed to me that my mother lived this code perfectly. She
appeared good, and when she slapped me awake, it was because I
deserved it. I was the bad person, the one who wouldn't wake up,
pay attention, remember what needed to be done. As a result, the
Freudian theory that the basic fault lay in a subconscious
conflict between my id and my superego, played out as a conflict
between my dad and me, made sense to me. That was the problem,
why I couldn't sleep, why I kept making mistakes, why I could
seem so dumb. Furthermore, the theory made sense out of a number
of dreams that I was having at the time. Some of these dreams
were sexual, and of course, sex was a big thing for Freud. The
Freudian theory made sense of things, and I began to believe it.
As a result, at about the age of sixteen, I came to the
conclusion that my basic personality had been forced underground
by the age of eight. Before then, I was strong and rebellious.
In grade school, I was stronger and faster then any of my
classmates. I could easily beat them up. But by the age of ten,
I was weaker than others. At that time, I got beat up for the
first time in my life.
The development mentioned above seems to be moving me toward
death, or at least impairment. There were also forces in the
direction of life. Many years later I read Fannon's Wretched
of the Earth. In it he discusses how the oppressed take out
their frustration on each other the Saturday night violence
found in the bars and slums all over the world. I read Fannon in
1968, and thought at once of my childhood, of how I used to beat
Jack up quite a bit. One time, however, when we were visiting
relatives in Tennessee, the cousins were having a pillow fight.
I was slugging it out and blasted my brother pretty hard, he
staggered up against a door. As I was moving in to finish him
off, I looked at his face. There was fear written all over it.
For some reason I didn't hit him, and further resolved not to
hit him again. I was about eight at the time. In part, this may
have been a response to my mother's affirming the worth of
kindness and Christian ideals.
Some time after that, my brother and I became friends. When
really young, my parents let us play some, but when we moved to
Kansas, the work really got hard. We moved when I was ten, in
1952. Jack and I made a pact against Daddy, at first never to
tell on each other, and then silently, without ostensibly
agreeing on it, it turned into a war. It was a war of passive
resistance on our part. We never volunteered to do anything,
showed little initiative, and did only as told. This made
working together difficult.
We built a room onto the side of our house and started the work
with three trowels. Very early on, one of them got lost. Dad
wanted to know who lost it. Jack said he hadn't lost it. I knew
I hadn't. As a result, dad never bought another trowel. We spent
two more years working with two trowels. This meant that one of
us stood around doing nothing half the time. Daddy wouldn't let
the person without the trowel sit down. It was usually me. I
seemed to be the least competent. I can remember many afternoons
and dark twilights, standing there in the cold and dark, aching
tired and wishing I could sit down. But Jack and I banded
together, and in later years, my twenties, I used to think that
if he had turned against me I would never have made it out of
there sane. He never ran me down, or made remarks about me. In
fact he rarely said anything to anybody. He was silent almost
all the time. People thought he was strange. Every now and then
he would say something, and sometimes he could say very funny
subtle things about my parents which they didn't understand.
Then he and I would giggle uncontrollably. It was a strange
experience. I used to tell my friends about it when I got older.
Everyone thought it strange. But, in his own strange way, Jack
helped me.
Although we really started working hard in Kansas, I can't help
but feel that things eased up there in some way. My parents
seemed a bit more relaxed. They weren't so tight money wise. We
bought a radio, mother got involved in the PTA trying to improve
the quality of our education. Sometimes Dad wouldn't make us
work all the time and would hit fly balls to us. We would have
picnics out in our side lot. I liked that. We went to some
plays, the Starlight Theater, and mother took us skating every
now and then with the church group. It was never black and
white. It was people doing the best they could with what they
had.
Further, I made a decision to come out of my dream world at
thirteen. Until then, I had carried on a continuous fantasy,
stories I created in my mind. I started paying attention in
class and discovered I could do well in mathematics with little
effort, that I actually had some brains. Up until then I felt I
had been unfavorably compared to my brother Jack. He learned to
read at four, was reading David Copperfield at six, and
was basically a genius. I had trouble reading, but once started,
I read voraciously. I remember seeing my brother carrying a
bucket of water down to the cow with a book in one hand. At
thirteen, I began to observe the world around me, but not as a
participant, or a wholehearted one at any rate. By that time I
already had the plate glass feeling. I became very self
conscious, as do many at that age, and felt socially
incompetent. This was the basic truth, as we had very little
social contact. There was some social contact through the
church, but that was difficult as we were pretty much on the
outside in that environment. Later in high school, I noticed
fellow students carrying on small talk, something I couldn't do.
I wondered how they got so smart about so many things.
When young, before the age of ten, I used to ask my mother all
the time if she loved me. She always said, "yes." But I could
never believe her, given some of the things that were going on.
I felt she preferred Jack to me. Perhaps she didn't, but I took
the brunt of the struggle. Jack told me years later the he felt
guilty about not fighting back. We lost so many struggles that
we got so we wouldn't ask for anything. For example, in the
tenth grade we couldn't stand our haircuts anymore. Dad cut our
hair to save money, and he always butchered it. After every
haircut, other kids made fun of us. A classmate offered to cut
our hair for twenty five cents after school. We would of course
miss that time working. We had a great test of wills, but Daddy
wouldn't let us go home with someone after school. The whole
thing was very humiliating, having to ask him. Presumably, we
never showed weakness in our family. After that, I resolved
never to ask him for anything. But anyway, after reading Freud I
realized the whole thing was a matter of instincts, of super
egos, and the ego trying to steer a precarious way in an animal
world. It explained everything, made it rational, and left no
question beyond further analysis. This made the whole thing
bearable because I could rationally understand it. It was as if
no one was really at fault, since at bottom, we were basically
complex animals. That was really most interesting.
The happiest times of all were in Tennessee. We went there for
two weeks every summer. My folks were often happy there,
especially my mother when visiting her family. We would all
gather, aunts, uncles and cousins down on granddaddy's farm. I
never had to work while there. In the daytime the cousins would
go to the creek (the branch in middle Tennessee parlance) where
we would catch crayfish, go swimming, and mess around. We got a
bit out of line at times, killed a chicken by drowning, (Jack
and I engineered that feat by getting my cousin to experiment
with a chicken under water), and jumped around in the hay in the
barn. At night the stars would be shining. We played piggy wants
a signal or red rover. I could hear the grown ups talking, see
the lights on my uncle's cigarette butts, and would sense a
great clean world around me where all belonged at home. On
Sunday we would go to the Church, the fundamentalists Church of
Christ. People used paper fans with pictures of Jesus on them,
and we sang songs like "What a Friend We Have in Jesus," the
"Old Rugged Cross," and others. Sometimes I would find myself
close to tears, as if a great hymn were taking place somewhere,
and I at last had just begin to hear it. Over at my father's
parents things were a bit depressed. But even there we were
happy. Jack and I played all day long by ourselves. They lived
on a farm as well, and we could roam at will. Once we visited in
winter. I can remember the cold, a Saturday night in winter,
with the wind blowing through the cracks in the floor. We were
all huddled in the front room around the stove. The Grand Ole
Opry was on. I was happy then. I loved the country music and all
of us together.
There was one thing that happened that didn't seem to fit
Freud's theory, or if explained, failed to do justice to the
sense itself. On certain days, unexpectedly, I would be
absolutely overwhelmed with beauty and sadness. Sometimes there
were particular causes. One time when very young I heard a
country song, I couldn't have heard it more than once or twice,
and never since. I was seven or eight and it made an indelible
and profound impression . The words were as follows:
I had a home one time, I left it all behind
And I'd go back home, if I could clear my mind.
Crying, crying, all of the time
I've got a broken heart, I've got a tangled mind.
When we were still living in Alexandria, I used to go off by
myself and sing this song over and over. I would burst into
tears, and hide so no one could see me. I seemed to be touched
by almost anything sad. I saw my first movie at about seven. It
was shown during school in the auditorium. It was "Heidi."
Halfway through the movie Heidi gets lost on the mountain. I
found myself sobbing uncontrollably. At that point the film was
stopped so the reel could be changed. The lights were turned on.
The little kids sitting around me started staring at me. I felt
the same way when I first read "The Ugly Duckling," and my
favorite piano piece, which I played over and over was "Long,
Long Ago." As I played it I would at times be overwhelmed with a
haunting sense of sadness, as if something beautiful and good
had been irrevocably lost. There was one story that I
particularly liked: "The Musicians of Brennan." It concerned
some animals who befriended each other, and journeyed along to
find a home. When I got out to Kansas these experiences seemed
to intensify, and involved a cosmic and transcendent sense. It
seemed some days as if the sky would open up, that all would be
free, a haunting beauty would pervade the world with intense
sadness. Everything would come together in harmony, every blade
of grass, the wind, the sunlight streaming in from the sky.
These sensations of sadness, beauty, and joy would become so
intense that it seemed that I would live forever. In moments
like that it was good to be alive, worth everything it seemed.
Nevertheless, in looking back on my childhood I often wondered
if the good outweighed the bad. Many days it seemed like a
wasteland, the dominant image being a cold wind or the dead of
winter. I remember day after day, waking up in the freezing
cold. We slept on the back porch where the temperature fell to
zero in the winter time. I would crawl out of bed, eat oatmeal,
force myself out into the cold to carry water to the cow. We
milked her outside in a stanchion. I would huddle under her
udder with the north wind on my back to clean the dung off her
tits. Then force myself to school, and then home to work on
after dark with Dad and Jack, scarcely talking, and then eat,
study and go to bed. That was life, cold emotionally cold,
spiritually cold with my parent's hard religion, physically
difficult.
In reflecting on life I have often wondered why we continue to
live and go on. I have searched back looking for some enduring
goodness to affirm, to give life worth and dignity. A few years
I wrote down some of the events of my childhood. My narrative
began with these words which express one basic question of this
paper:
When I was ten years old we moved out to Kansas and I used
to like the weather there. In the summer time it would get
pretty hot, but sometimes the wind would blow and the clouds
would come up out of the West. I would feel the wind blowing
through my body, like something was breaking up inside, and
the land would open up with the trees blowing in the wind.
When the sun shone through the blowing clouds the whole sky
would be singing, and I would run by with the wind so glad
that I would almost cry. Later on in life I would remember
the open land, sky, and clouds and think about those days.
Sometimes I would get the wide open feelings of the mid
West, something beautiful and empty, but clean. It was the
clean I liked the best, and the wind. I guess the wind can
blow you clean. When I was in graduate school, by the fifth
year anyway, I was pretty depressed all the time, and angry,
and I used to get up in the morning and dance to myself,
listening to Leadbelly on my record player and thinking
about the water washing up on the Florida beaches where I
had been once or twice before. Then, every now and then,
faint nostalgic feelings would come across me, feeling of
the mid West and the weather out in Kansas. I would remember
the old days, as if something good had happened then. But I
really don't know if something good had ever been or not, or
rather as if the days beneath the Kansas skies expressed the
things that had never been, good things, or perhaps the good
that always seemed to pass away.
Time came to leave home. My Dad had decreed that I go to the
University of the South, created to produce Southern gentlemen
as a new Oxford of the South. I was admitted early, and some
belongings were sent to the University. Just before I left Dad
taught me how to drive. The day came to leave. Mother took me
down to the bus station in Kansas City. It was a hot day and the
city seemed dirty. She pulled up to the curb, the engine was
still running. I got out and looked back in to say goodbye. She
looked at me and said: "Well Rob, we didn't know if you were
going to make it or not, but I guess you turned out all right."
I said goodbye and she pulled away from the curb. I walked in
and got on the bus. My childhood had ended.
I used to wonder what she meant by her remark. I think she was
referring to my dreamy incompetent state, or to the fact that I
several times got violent headaches and nerves. She was probably
relieved that I had pulled out of it somewhere along the line.
I really liked going to college and was actually fairly happy
and cheerful for a few years. After the original shock I made
some very good friends. One of them was named Ralph. We used to
have some wonderful conversations. I hadn't intended to join a
fraternity, but did. Sewanee was a very socially conscious
school. There was a pecking order. My fraternity was near the
bottom, and I was near the bottom. I didn't much care about
that, people considered me out of it, or religious, or whatever.
But I had never really seen social stigmatization before. When
in grade school in Kansas, I used to hang with some of the black
kids. There was a bunch of them living just North of us. But
there weren't any at Sewanee, and students were calling other
students "gimps." That was alien to me and I didn't like it.
Consequently, I ignored those socially above me, and befriended
anyone I pleased, regardless of who they were. Some of my frat
brothers didn't like it, but I made some great friends and had
wonderful times.
Ralph and I had some interesting conversations. Very early on I
decided or felt that the most interesting thing that had ever
happened to me were the experiences of beauty and sadness that I
had known when young. I also noticed that I wasn't having them
any more. I used to wonder if they were simply "oceanic
feelings" (quoting Freud), or whatever. I began to find traces
of these ideas in numerous places. I was touched by Plato's
allegory of the cave which raised the possibility of a
transcendent world. A poem, "Intimations of Immortality," raised
the same question. Ralph and I discussed these things, and I was
amazed to learn that he had similar impressions. After a few
months at Sewanee I ran across the word "mysticism," and read a
book on the matter. It was interesting. But I couldn't help but
notice, at least according to this book, that the mystics spent
years in "dark nights," severe deprivations and penances, and
somehow that didn't strike me as the way of truth. Something
else was needed, another way. I wondered about it all the time.
People thought at first that I was sort of religious. I never
swore, knew initially nothing about girls, didn't drink, was
polite, and basically considerate up to a point. But after I had
been there a while I changed my religious beliefs, though
initially maintaining my standard or morality. I read
Dostoevski's The Brothers Karamazov. It made a powerful
and extraordinary impression. I was particularly shaken by
Ivan's conversation with Alyosha. In this conversation Ivan
proposed to his monkish brother that God was either evil or
impotent. He then described in brutal detail the suffering of a
little child, locked in an outhouse by his parents, covered with
feces. With deadly earnestness Ivan went on, demanding that God
not be good on the basis of the one child, much less the
millions who have suffered hideously day after day for all known
recorded human history. Alyosha was alarmed and frightened by
his brother's arguments. He cried out that Ivan would come to no
good end with these terrible ideas. But one thing seemed clear
to me: Alyosha never refuted Ivan's argument, never. And
therefore I joined Ivan and gave up religion, although it always
interested me.
Throughout this period I rapidly became disenchanted with the
academic process. The first few weeks I was there I studied and
was making very good marks, but after a while the academic
pursuit began to irritate me. I had initially wanted to study
philosophy, but became disenchanted with the introductory
course. I began to suspect that all our cognition wasn't going
to get us anywhere. So much of the academics at Sewanee was a
sort of snobbish game, with people trying to be intelligent. I
determined to study what interested me whether or not it was in
the curriculum, and spend my time as I pleased. Doubtless this
was a rebellion against life as I had known it, yet I still
think, deeper than that, that Sewanee did not have a social
vision except for those of the right pedigree. I used to ask
people all sorts of things, and wait to hear a valid word, and
got very little. Furthermore, and this is hindsight, I don't
think I could have taken the pressure of success. I was so
tense, had been so tense for so long, that any kind of
competitive situation such as tests made me so nervous that I
could hardly function. I could do well, but could do equally
well with little or no preparation. So I decided to study as I
pleased, and ended up making A's in things like math or
philosophy which required thinking ability, and D's in history
which required memorization. I spent my time reading, talking to
people, playing sports, and extending my analysis of the world
which had begun with the reading of Freud.
At some point during that first year, I made another decision.
While reading Freud I had been attracted to the idea of
determinism. This seemed like a sensible theory. Nevertheless I
rejected determinism. I don't really know why. The more I
thought about it, the more I became convinced that such a theory
could never be verified one way or the other. It was useful in
forming hypotheses about the world, but the more I observed
reality the more mysterious it seemed to be. The summer after my
freshman year I had a long discussion with a girl from Smith in
which I argued against determinism. But I think something more
was behind my thinking. I had decided that the only real things
were those that could be experienced. I would not believe in God
or anything unless I had some sort of direct evidence of its
existence. Furthermore, I would not clutter up my experience
with unnecessary concepts. If life gave itself as mysterious, it
was mysterious, although it at the same time seemed riddled with
a secondary causality. I suspect there was an existentialist
influence. Further there is an anti intellectual element in my
family, a rejection of this world, with its comprehensive
intellectual systems, its social prestige, its excellence, and
its wealth. The "got rocks," was the term my mother used,
referring to very successful wealthy people. Perhaps that was an
influence.
In my junior year I read another book that made a very deep
impression, Dostoevski's The Possessed. This was an
incredible book. In it a man named Kirilov, an anarchist or
perhaps a socialist, declared that if there is no God there is
no law. To prove his point he committed suicide. I was struck by
the intensity and logic of his argument. Obviously there can be
"laws" without God, but where do they come from? They come from
us, from our will, or from our nature. (Another thing I didn't
like about determinism was that it led to a strange ethical
contradiction it didn't do justice to the apparent autonomy of
the will). In any event, if the laws were no longer holy, I
could break them. In the same book there is the story of a duel.
As the antagonists are about to shoot each other, one suddenly
perceives a vision of universal love. In an instant he realizes
the folly of his action. He laughs, lowers his gun, and allows
the other man to fire. It at once struck me that the way to
truth is in action, in intensity of experience, and that is the
path I began to choose.
My brother, Jack, came to Sewanee one year behind me. We began
to form a nucleus of friends. There was Ralph, Hudgins, Jack,
Drew, and me. We had other friends as well. These people were
quite gifted and we had the most interesting discussions. Ralph
told me one time that although people were awed by my brother's
brains, that I had my share of talent as well. He was a great
and loyal friend, as were Drew and Hudge. Drew and Ralph
graduated and went to Vanderbilt to begin Ph.D.'s in theoretical
physics. I would often hitch hike down there for the weekend. We
had wonderful parties with the Vanderbilt girls. During the day
discussions would rage over every imaginable topic. These were
some of the happiest times of my life. There was a quality in
our being together, in our spirited thought and fun, that I have
never been able to recapture. Those were great and happy days.
With women, I was a little slow in the beginning, but with time,
began to pick up steam. Whenever I was with someone, they would
seem the most captivating women in the world. I acted as if they
were so good looking and fun loving that I could hardly stand
it. I myself would adopt a hell raising lets have fun attitude,
that ultimately communicated a feeling that I really didn't care
what they did. If they didn't want to have a good time with me,
it was their loss as much as mine. My relations with women
gathered in intensity.
One afternoon Ralph came up to Sewanee and said he had met a
rather amazing girl. We were walking up the driveway across from
the dining hall. I asked what was so amazing about her. He got
evasive and asked if I would like to meet her. I said sure. Next
weekend I went down to Nashville and met a girl by the name of
Elizabeth. She was a bit overweight, just a tad, but real cute.
She was also the most extraordinary woman I had ever met in my
life. We began an amazing intense interaction. It seemed as if I
had become very acute. I remembered everything, honed in on her
with every cell in my body. She was cute, girlish, giddy, and
brilliant. She was a triple major in English, history, and
sociology, a recognized writer on campus, and president of the
student association. Her father was a millionaire orange grower
back in Florida and she drove a big car. We went crazy for each
other. In no time at all she told me she loved me. I wasn't used
to that, no one had ever said they loved me. I had never ever
felt that I was loved. It swept me away. I believed her, that
she really did love me. I was intensely happy, forgot
everything, and went wild for her. I never said that I loved
her, the words never crossed my lips, but finally I did. We went
down to Florida together. Her family lived in a nice big house.
I saw her bathroom. It was large and the counter was crammed
with innumerable bottles, powders, and all kinds of stuff. It
made me feel strange.
One night when we were together she started crying. I asked her
what was the matter. She was afraid things would come to a bad
end for me. I wanted to know what she meant by that. She told me
a long story, one boyfriend after another, and how she had
broken them, one after the other. I listened. The last man to
fall in love with her had been a Jewish professor who had been
through the concentration camps. It had become a campus scandal.
Shortly after the scandal began, he died in a car crash. I
didn't say much, simply said not to worry about it, that I would
be all right. But I started analyzing her. I analyzed everyone I
met, and actually, had begun to try to figure her out from the
day we met. I got strong vibes around the house that her father
was very possessive, that she was intimidated by her younger
sister who was dumb but incredibly good looking, that she felt
inferior as a woman, and hence went out proving herself time
after time. She as much told me all these things while we
talked, and many other things as well. Our relationship began to
unravel. She had wanted to get married. I had declined but under
her winsome charm had agreed. I had given my heart away. But
then she began to say things to the effect that we were far
apart socially, that I could never support her in her way of
life, or even understand it. She was strangely religious,
Catholic, and I didn't go for that. All these hints came up one
after another. I fought them all, but began to crumble inside.
Then she started talking about what a nice young man one of my
fraternity brothers was. He was nice, very cultured, sort of
good looking in a weak way, wealthy and not too bright.
One afternoon we drove back from Nashville and she let me off in
Manchester. I needed to hitch hike the rest of the way. I got a
ride to Monteagle, about ten miles from Sewanee. There nobody
picked me up. Night came. I started walking back to Sewanee.
Everything came crashing down on me. I started crying in the
dark. I hadn't cried in years. I cried hard for a long time, and
found myself repeating uncontrollably, "I'm so bad, so bad, I am
so bad."
I got to Sewanee and saw my friend, Walker. He was my friend and
talked to me. I lay in my bed for about three days, thinking,
and decided that was that. I went downstairs, called her up, and
said I needed to talk to her that weekend. That weekend was her
sorority annual festival or something. I told her we were
finished. She got ugly mad, then crying, saying that I would
regret the whole thing. I said nothing. Just ended it, finished
it. We never got together again. A few months later she sent me
a one act play she had written She had won a contest with it. In
it a bare footed young man in a tuxedo breaks up with the one he
loves. He is very cold about it, analytical. She dies inside. At
the time I thought her portrayal was a bit overdone, but in
retrospect I can see that although I was hurting on the inside,
on the outside, in terms of action, I was as cold as ice. After
that a profound and deep sadness came over my life. I lived
increasingly in the shadow.
I was taking Shakespeare that semester. It was my last semester
at Sewanee. We read Anthony and Cleopatra. I had flunked
first semester Shakespeare and don't know why I took it again
the second semester. Anthony falls in love with Cleopatra. He is
crazy about her. Caesar can't understand it. Formerly, Anthony
had ruled the world, a great warrior. Caesar said of him that he
would "drink the stale of the gilded puddle and eat the bark of
trees." But what had happened to him? He gave his heart away,
and with his heart, his kingdom. Caesar set out to take the
kingdom by power, while Anthony in love, failed to make the
necessary effort to tear himself away from Cleopatra and defend
himself. In the final battle, Anthony, at the crucial moment,
when victory hung in the balance, cries out to Cleopatra, "My
kingdom for a kiss." And there I thought lay the most crucial
question of all. For what good is it to live without love, and
what good is love without staking everything you have on it? But
if you do that, what if it destroys you? I knew that if I had
stayed with Elizabeth, I would have been destroyed. It was a
great question, but I had chosen Caesar's way. I could have
stayed on with her a little longer and had some crazy happy
times with lots of pain, but I had chosen Caesar's way and that
was that. I wondered about it all the time.
Right after we broke up, I had several dreams of extraordinary
violence. This interested me and I started reading Jung. In one
of his books a young woman has a dream in which she approached a
dark lake while a cool wind begins to blow. As I read the
account of the dream a chill swept through me, a sense of fear,
and I began to wonder if there might be something to Jung's
ideas on the unconscious, the need to enter the unconscious in
order to attain wholeness.
One afternoon Ralph and I went to a record store and he bought a
Joan Baez record. One of her songs has these opening lines:
At my door the leaves are falling
A cold wind will come.
Sweethearts go by together
But I still miss someone.
Every time I heard that song I felt very sad, and it came to
represent not only the end with Elizabeth, but the end of my
friends, all our good times together, great conversations, and
parties. We were all about to graduate. One evening Ralph and I
were taking a walk. We got to talking about everything that had
happened. He said he thought hard dark times were coming for all
of us. It frightened me to talk to him, and I wondered if it
were really true.
At the start of my junior year I had taken a senior level
theoretical math course. It was a proof course, which requires
intuition and logic, and although I was new to this sort of
mathematics, I very quickly became one of the best in the class.
I enjoyed theoretical mathematics. It was easy and somewhat fun.
I didn't know what to do with myself, and so I majored in
mathematics. Then, for the lack of something better, I decided
to go to graduate school. My overall academic record was poor
though good in math, my options were limited. My major professor
suggested the University of Kansas where they had an outstanding
group theorist. I went there.
Things were strange at KU. I hardly talked with anyone for
months. I was living in a boarding house and talked to one of
the boarders from time to time. But mostly I just sat and
thought, read books, studied some mathematics, and exercised. I
did very well in mathematics in the beginning since I studied. I
was moved into the advanced group theory class, or rather asked
to read its text on my own, which I did.
I ran into a philosophy major who suggested I attend a
philosophy class. I did so. It was taught by a man from Scotland
and was basically the positivist approach to reality. I liked
that approach. It made a lot of sense to me, and seemed to have
the same sort of sense about it as does mathematics.
Nevertheless I couldn't fit its theories in too well with the
intense feeling of sadness and beauty that I had known as a
child, or the perceptions about Jung. Perhaps they could have
been harmonized at a logical or theoretical level, but
considered qualitatively, they were two different approaches to
reality, two moods and perspectives. I wanted a total harmonious
system.
Just before leaving Sewanee I had read Shakespeare's The
Tempest and considered it one of the most beautiful things I
had ever read. In the play there is a dumb monster, but this
dumb monster in his sleep dreams the most sublime things, or
perhaps he hears them, sweet sounds, twanging instruments, so
haunting and beautiful that when he wakes he weeps to sleep
again. As I read this I found myself crying, and began to wonder
if there might be a "beyond." The course in positivism limited
itself to human experience, and I couldn't let go of that.
Whatever it was, it had to be real.
Towards the end of my first year at KU I met a very beautiful
Jewish girl named Ilene. She was physically strong and
passionate, with a brooding intense nature. I was haunted and
captivated by her. We had really wonderful times in many ways.
After a while she threatened to break up with me unless I said I
loved her. I couldn't say that because something in me seemed to
be dead. Our happiest and most intense moments made me sad. I
lay in my room and thought, and decided that within the
conventional meanings of the term, that I did love her, so I
said so. But I couldn't help but think that my positivist
thinking was a cop out.
One afternoon as I was lying in my room, I looked out the window
and chanced to see a person who had been the student body
president in our Junior High eighth grade. I went out and said
"Hello," and we started talking. He hadn't changed in ten years.
It was weird. It was in the eight grade that I had walked the
aisle in mother's fundamentalist church after being tormented
for months with the fear of going to hell. Now I was in graduate
school, and doing and thinking things I would have never dreamed
of. It made me feel kind of strange. I wondered what would
happen if I kept on going and never stopped anywhere. I realized
that the former student president had accepted the basic
American values, his chief problem was that he had spent more
than he had, at his wife's insistence, in order to have a nice
house, car, and furniture. I cared nothing for these things. I
wore the same clothes every day, which had become rags, ate the
same things, and lived increasingly like an animal.
The year passed. Ilene transferred to the University of
Wisconsin. I became more and more alone, spending my time
reading books, doing less mathematics, and playing my guitar. I
had made two friends, one Schiefelbusch, who went on to the
University of Chicago for a Ph.D. in mathematics, and the other
Markstein who was in the doctoral program at Kansas. Markstein
and I were kind of alike. When we didn't have girl friends we
got together, played gin and scrabble, and talked about things.
He thought I was strange, but we really liked each other. I
found out all about him, especially how his parents came from
Austria during the War. They were Jewish and had fled Hitler. I
also dated his sister.
I bought a cheap car and drove up to see Ilene. We drove to
California. It was a strange trip. Then we took highway one down
the coast. In San Luis Obispo the generator went out. There was
no way to get another soon, and Ilene needed to get back to
school. I bought a short fan belt and bypassed the generator and
ran the fan off the drive shaft. This meant we couldn't use the
lights and had to drive off the battery. We would drive like
crazy in the daytime, park on a hill, spend the night, jump
start it in the morning and keep going. Every day or so we had
to have the battery recharged. In Colorado the engine blew up.
We hitchhiked to the Denver airport. She got on a plane. We
stared at each other just before she walked away. She had large
beautiful brown eyes. I kept going alone and spent the night in
my sleeping bag beside the road. The stars were beautiful that
night. The next day I was back in Lawrence, Kansas, and got
together with Schiefelbusch who hadn't left yet for Chicago.
The next fall passed very rapidly. I lived alone in the top of a
hippy house. Everybody there was smoking dope, but I stayed
alone. I was indifferent to comfort and society and ate the same
thing every meal for months mackerel out of a can, wheat bread,
orange juice, some beans and cheese. Late that summer I found a
Black Diamond watermelon. It was the best watermelon I ever had.
I sliced off a big piece of it every day for a couple of weeks.
Time passed quickly. My major professor had told me six months
earlier that I needed to write a masters thesis. He suggested
that I read everything written on wreath products and summarize
the matter. He gave me a ten page article. I eventually read it.
When he suggested another article, I read about five pages of it
and got an idea that might generate some original theorems and
save me months of tedious research. After a couple of weeks I
came up with a number of new theorems. It then became a matter
of writing them down which I did. I got a Masters.
That Thanksgiving, Drew came out to visit me and we went up to
the University of Nebraska to visit a friend named McClanahan.
We couldn't find him, but heard he was at a party. We found the
party. Everyone was drinking, doping, and dancing. I joined in.
After a while I saw an unusually alive, well built, good looking
blond. We started dancing and I started kidding around with her.
We had an intense attraction and had a wonderful time together.
The next weekend she broke up with her boyfriend at the
University of Chicago and came down to be with me. She was the
most powerful girl I had ever met, somewhat unscrupulous, and
determined. We got along very well and I respected her. Her name
was Ramona.
We broke up after the semester and she went back to Washington
State where her parents lived. My major professor was moving on
to Michigan State and I was to go with him. I drifted through
the summer and flew out to visit Mona in Seattle. We took a trip
all over the West in her car and ended up in Lincoln, Nebraska.
It was beautiful up there in late summer. The sky was open, the
sun always seemed to be shining and we were pretty happy for a
while. She wanted to get married but I wouldn't do it. It didn't
seem right to me. It was a convention that people broke when
they wanted to. Why not live together until tired of each other.
We broke apart and I hitchhiked to East Lansing, Michigan
carrying everything in a metal suitcase without a handle. I
carried it on my shoulder. On the way I got picked up in a pick
up with some little children in the back. There was some hay in
the truck bed, and they were laughing because the wind was
blowing straw all over the place. I laughed too. Just before I
got picked up I noticed some little butterflies playing on some
rocks. I hadn't seen that kind of little butterfly since I was a
little boy playing in Tennessee. It made me think about how
transitory life was. Everything passing away.
I first recall that feeling when I was about twelve. We were
driving to Tennessee and stopped to eat a bite at a roadside
picnic table. I wandered over to a nearby fence and started
looking at the ground. There was a bottle top there, and all of
a sudden it hit me that someone I didn't know had passed that
way and left no identity as to who they were, only the sign of
their passing by. This made me feel sad, and in later years gave
me an intense desire to live as hard as I could. I often
remembered the biblical quotation that all flesh is as grass,
the wind blows, the sun comes, and we pass away to be forgotten.
I often wondered if there was anything eternal that never dies.
When I got to Michigan life got sort of strange. I was feeling
dead inside. It was awful. In my anomie, I ended up living in a
basement. There was no furniture there. It rented for twenty
five dollars a month. I happened to find a mattress lying by the
side of the road. I dragged it down there. There was a little
area where the concrete was raised, and I put the mattress
there. The drain from the toilet above would overflow but the
raised concrete kept me dry. There was a single light bulb and I
lay there and thought and thought. The people living above me
were crazy. One of the girls, exceedingly homely, was trying to
get pregnant and having men in all the time. Her bed was always
thumping above me. She wanted me to go to bed with her but I
didn't have the heart to try. I was reading all the time, and
started reading books of a philosophic or religious nature in
the attempt to get out of my hole. I felt absolutely dead. On
campus I kept thinking that I saw Mona walking around. That
seemed strange to me.
After a while I read a book that had a devastating impact on me.
It was Colin Wilson's The Outsider . Colin Wilson
describes the outsider personality. It is a person who is
extremely alienated and alone. He suggests that a mythic way of
looking at this personality is to hypothesize that they had once
seen a vision of haunting beauty and joy, and that afterwards
the vision is forgotten but still active in its effects. As a
result, they continue to live in a world that seems pale and
drab by comparison. These people are bored, they don't know what
to do with themselves, and they often end up doing intense
things in order to arouse themselves to life. I had never
encountered a description that seemed to speak so directly to
how I was living and feeling. I really didn't believe that I had
a vision, but it did seem as if I felt like I had one. On the
other hand, I suspected that my anomie in the basement might
have simply been the result of breaking up with Mona, or perhaps
there was a psychological explanation of some sort. I didn't
know. One thing did seem clear from the book. None of the
outsiders described in the book ever got out of their hells.
They all, in one way or another, ended up destroying themselves.
There was apparently no solution to the darkness that had
progressively seized upon my soul for some years. I began to
feel doomed, that there was no hope for me, and that my life was
manifesting a gradual decline, which was, indeed, the case.
As I thought about these matters I began to wonder if I should
get back with Mona. I couldn't make sense out of my thinking I
was seeing her on campus, except perhaps I really did miss her.
But I hated the idea of marriage, and secondly I suspected a
desire to see her was an attempt to break out of my growing
isolation. On the other hand, I found myself more attracted to
her than any other girl I'd known. I really didn't know why, she
was the most forceful woman I had ever known, and we had the
greatest impact on each other. I decided to act before it was
too late. We got married.
The first year of marriage was pretty happy. We talked a lot and
had lots of fun. My thinking was evolving rapidly. After a few
months of marriage, Mona and I went down to the University of
Chicago to visit her old boyfriend, Charlie, whom I liked as
well. Schiefelbusch was there and we all got stoned together.
The very first murmurings against the war in Vietnam were just
beginning, and I ran across a student at Chicago who was
convinced that the world was headed toward destruction. I asked
"why." He mentioned the bomb, dwindling resources, the cold war,
expanding population, etc. I asked what should be done about it.
He suggested that we blow up a few things. I thought about that.
I began to ask him where he was from, and in an apparent spirit
of being friendly, found out about his early life and family. He
was from Arkansas. He was bitterly antagonistic against his
family, particularly his father, and that made me suspect that
he was projecting his unresolved aggressions against his father
onto the society at large, particularly the authority of the
government. Nevertheless, even if this were true, what he was
saying still might be the truth. Furthermore, I had become
increasingly restless over recent years about the fact that I
wasn't doing anything with myself, just drifting through. My
brother Jack once said that all he ever hoped for out of life
was to get through and have a reasonably good time. So I decided
that I would investigate the war, the bomb, and everything of a
political, social, historical and economic nature.
I started out just trying to find out about the war in Vietnam.
I read voraciously and talked with people from all over the
world. As I read a dreadful picture emerged. While a child we
never discussed politics or the world's condition, and for some
strange reason, I never thought to look at the world in the
large. I began to wonder why the war had occurred, and this led
to reading history, then Marxist thought and economics.
Something happened to me at that time. It is possible to read
about the world's suffering and pass over it, or through it,
with the mind. I was not able to do this. The more I read about
the war, the napalming of children, the mass murders in Russia,
the slaughters in Africa, the horrible suffering in China due to
imperialism, the more my heart and mind filled up with the
terrifying reality of suffering. I began to go mad. Every bit of
information hurt my feelings and drove me into a rage. I
remember standing in a store and looking at a little child in a
picture. She had been burned by napalm. I felt so sick inside
that I could hardly bear it. Further, as I read about the bomb
and pollution, and the dwindling resources, the more probable it
seemed to me that we were going to destroy ourselves. Most of
the social scientists were very pessimistic. It was the time of
apocalypse, and I found myself experiencing its horrors within
me. Life became a torment. I tried to figure out what to do
about it, and who was at fault. That became almost impossible.
The left was putting out one line and the administration, Nixon
and many of the academics, were putting out another. I read and
read, thought and thought, and talked to people, and finally
decided that we could not win the war in Vietnam. I didn't trust
anyone, as I long ago decided that most people would fool
themselves and bend truth to their own advantage if their
welfare was at stake. Nevertheless as far as the war was
concerned, I reduced it to elementary considerations, basic
facts of history, and decided that it could be won only by
blasting the Vietnamese into the Stone Age. That was probably
true. I began to demonstrate against the war. I joined The New
University Conference and worked in their endeavors. During one
demonstration I made a speech on the steps of one of the
buildings at Michigan State, right across from the police
administration building. The police were filming everything we
did. This was at the time when the Nixon administration was
using the IRS and other organizations to harass the students.
The fear of the government was at its height, and many in the
leftist movement were convinced that it was only a matter of
time before we were all rounded up.
At this time a shift occurred in my consciousness. I began to
get sensations of doom, cosmic perceptions of destruction. These
impressions were very powerful and terrifying. I felt horrible.
It required all my energy to keep going. I became a physical and
sexual addict. Sensations could calm me down, intense
sensations, and I had to have them all the time. I would often
go out swimming in the nearby quarry, even late in the fall, and
the water would feel like fire on my body. At night I would
wander around, thinking all the time. Then things began to
change, things I cannot talk about because of those I now love.
I got into some very heart rending and intense matters, things
that haunt me still and break my heart. Something inside of me
irrevocably snapped civilization, marriage, ordinary decent ways
of living were gone for good or so it seemed.
Little by little I began to feel that the ordinary ways of doing
things would not suffice, that something had to be done. I
decided not to take any more drugs. I was never much into it,
but even a moderate amount didn't feel right to me. I got the
sensation I wasn't coming back from trips to where I started,
and I noticed that so many who used drugs were passive pot
heads. I also decided that the guy from Chicago was probably
right. He had since been picked up by the government for smoking
dope. Mona and I began to have bitter fights. I could see that
we had gone different ways. There was no way to go back. I was
determined to go further into the anti war movement, planning
violence against the government, and she could not go with me.
She shouldn't do so for her own sake. I left graduate school and
got a job for the summer of 1969 teaching math at Sewanee. It
was to be the last summer with Mona, after that I was going on
my own. It was the saddest summer of my life. I really love
Mona. That fall she went to Europe and I hitchhiked around with
my younger brother, Richard. One night, driving by myself in a
car, I got to thinking about my mother and how hard she had
worked for us when we were children. All of a sudden I saw and
felt clearly that she loved us. I started crying. I had always
intellectually recognized that mother loved us in some sense,
but I never felt it before. I was selling her down the river by
taking the course of action that lay before me.
Mona got back from Europe. It was time to break up. We
participated in the great march on Washington in the fall of
1969. Just before that I had the worst apocalyptic vision ever.
I was in Gaithersburg, Maryland, visiting a friend, walking by
myself near the freeway. It seemed as if the whole world was
covered by a terrifying power of universal destruction. This
power had a sexual component, and the great power was connected
to me in a strange and haunting fashion. The cars whizzing by on
the interstate, the field itself, the sky, all seemed alive and
headed towards destruction. Mona and I broke up. We lay in bed
for three days, talking, fighting, weeping and finally did it. I
decided to go see Ralph, to see if he knew of any solution
besides violence. I found it difficult to take action because I
never knew the truth. Were my feelings the result of upbringing,
was the government actually destructive of the people's best
interest, was Marxist thought an accurate analysis of
imperialism? I never ever knew, but felt compelled to do
something.
I went to see Ralph. He had become a Christian. He started
talking about Jesus, computers, the logos, the spirit,
structure. He is one of the most brilliant people I had ever
known. He was involved in the charismatic movement and said that
he had seen miracles. This interested me but did not impress me.
I at once thought of explanations besides the divine one. For
instance, the miracles could be caused by some sort of
perturbation in a world soul due to the strange times in which
we lived. I began to do even more intense and risky things. But
I also began to listen carefully to Ralph. I had always doubted
that violence against the civil authority was really going to do
any good, they would always win, but felt so compelled to do
something that I couldn't think of anything else to do. The idea
of "one in a million" had crossed my mind many times.
Nevertheless, Ralph affirmed that idea that Jesus could do
things, help people, that God was real, and that he could be
experienced. Ralph was absolutely determined in the matter, and
I had to respect him because I knew that he had seen as much
pain as I. We went to visit one of his religious friends. They
all seemed to live in big houses, upper middle class, educated,
and the very people I couldn't stand. I felt they cared nothing
for the poor and oppressed, nor for the course of the world.
This friend of Ralph's amazed me. She started talking as if she
really knew God. God spoke to her, directed her, and challenged
her to lead a new life. This made a powerful impression. I began
to suspect that perhaps there was something here. Perhaps if
there was a God, and if he loved us, then perhaps he could do
something about the situation. I was partly mad, but not so mad
as to realize that my perceptions of reality were only relative,
that things may not be the way they seemed.
After a few days it occurred to me that I had committed myself
to trying whatever lay before me. That had been one result from
reading The Possessed, and therefore, integrity demanded
that I give myself to Christ to see if he was the truth. I
decided to do so, and prayed to Jesus, that if he existed, that
he show himself to me. I adopted the faith as a working
hypothesis. Later I found that passage in John's gospel where
Jesus says he will reveal himself to those who keep his
commandments. I determined to search out the truth of the matter
to the end. At the same time, I had moral problems to sort out.
I didn't believe the Bible was the inspired of God, that is of a
different logical order than committing oneself to the unknown.
But I had decided to seek Jesus and therefore, I would do
whatever might be needed even if I wasn't sure of it. I decided
that I would devote myself to basic things, eating, sleeping,
praying, being with friends. If unsure about the ethics of
something, I would try to avoid it.
After asking Jesus Christ to reveal himself to me, and deciding
to seek him, there was a sudden shift in my consciousness. It
all happened in one day. I knew evil existed, that was obvious,
but I never experienced it as a personal reality. That night I
had a dream in which an evil demonic shape attached itself to my
neck and tried to kill me. I awoke unable to move my neck and in
real pain. Perhaps it was a pinched nerve or something. Further
I seemed to be in some sort of a force field, or haze, my
perceptions were distorted, things seemed weird, and worst of
all I felt all around me a horrible evil presence that was bent
on my destruction. I was sick with fear. It was one of the most
horrible feelings of my life. I told Ralph about it. He
frequently lived in this sort of reality, and we began praying
desperately to get out of this hell. We tried to find, without
success, some of his friends to help us. The next day I felt
better but was very afraid. Ralph suggested that I see one of
his friends who had been healed from an auto wreck and had a
ministry of the laying on of hands for healing and exorcism.
That made sense to me as I was aware, and had been since I was
sixteen, that I was a distorted person and needed help.
I liked Ralph's friend. He was an architect, a relaxed and
enthusiastic fellow. He laid hands on me and started to pray. I
felt evil spirits being torn out of my body, glimpsing them
suddenly leaving me to the left. Suddenly the heavens opened up
and I was blasted by an overwhelming vision of God. On the left
I saw the world covered with wickedness, and to the right,
above, there was God as a raging fire of light directed against
the world. I realized in an instant that God was going to
destroy the world. My first impulse upon seeing God was to roar
to my feet, violently enraged, speaking in an unknown tongue,
but then I was struck down by the intensity of God. As a result
of this experience I came to the conclusion that God was going
to destroy the world.
This initial vision precipitated an imbalance in my personality.
In a way it was a horrible thing, and I would never want to go
through such a thing again. The effect was to release a fire
inside me, an energy, that illumined dimensions of myself that I
had never been aware of before. I entered what the mystics call
dark night of sense, although I didn't know that at the time.
This encounter lasted, in its first phase, for one and one half
years. It was a decent into hell and I was in torment for most
of that time. I lived by will alone and one other factor which
will be mentioned shortly.
The vision left me somewhat blasted and irrational. I was
overwhelmed. God existed. I thought people would be amazed to
learn this fact. My cousin called me up. He was getting a Ph.D.
in Psychology at the University of Massachusetts. My brother
Jack had called him to see if there was anything that could be
done for me. My friends thought I was gone. In my blasted state
I told my cousin what had happened. He related this story to his
professors, telling them that I was the "most ripped up person"
he had ever known. They said there was no hope for me. After a
few weeks I realized my vision meant nothing to most people,
that they only considered me fanatical at best. Further, I began
to suspect that many of the charismatics I saw were not really
solid in their faith. Therefore I decided to say little, and
only speak when my awareness of the situation called for it. I
realized that almost no one would understand me, and that, in
order to communicate, I must be with people as they are while
still preserving the vision. This was a very difficult
undertaking, and seemed impossible, but I set out to do it.
Further, my experiment of asking Jesus to show himself to me was
not concluded. I wasn't going to say anything that I hadn't
tested, and tested hard. After a few weeks it became obvious to
me that the vision of God as fire could have been an
hallucination.
Truth was and is important to me. While at Michigan I used to
wonder all the time as to what theories, or combination of them,
accurately interpreted reality. It wasn't just an academic
question. If the ultimate basis of the world's problems is
psychological, then perhaps we all need therapy. If the
fundamental category is economic and social so that personal
problems stem from being alienated from the means of production,
then perhaps we need revolution. If our problem is sin against
God and others, then we need forgiveness and God. What is the
truth? What is ultimately real? To answer that one needs to
think about epistemology. But the vision of God, and the whole
question of knowing God in the first place, raised most acutely
the issue of epistemology. I had not read Hume but I was
familiar with the gist of his argument.
After praying and thinking about it for some time, I decided I
needed to make an absolute commitment to Mona, if she were still
willing to get back together. I went to visit her and told her
what little I knew about the Christian faith. She was interested
and we got together. We heard about jobs in Ocala, Florida where
there was a very active Christian community. We went there and
lived for about a year and one half.
Right after the vision I was plunged into another world. I was
assaulted by evil, evil that lived in me, that was personal,
that sought my destruction. I quickly recognized that it had
been there all along, working covertly, organizing my
perceptions, guiding my thoughts, bending my will. My
determination to quit my former life style had deflected these
powers from their intents and purposes. Under the light of the
vision, which seemed to live in me, these powers emerged into
consciousness with terrifying power. The most powerful force
that had driven me for years was rage. This had reached such
proportions that I could barely control myself. This was the
force that created the evil visions of total destruction. The
logic of this force was simple: There is no love in the world,
purity of death is better than this rotten loveless world, and
freedom can be achieved by destroying this world to the ground,
and then (this part is illusion), we build a better one. This
spirit was forecast by Dostoeveski in The Possessed and
is a power that is present in the world today. When this spirit
first emerged into my consciousness I was terrified. I awoke one
morning in abject fear, sensing a menacing presence. I went to
an early morning communion and the power diminished, but
returned with renewed fury that afternoon. That night, a few
people, including Al Durrance, the Episcopal priest of that
church, laid hands on me and cast this demon out in the name of
Jesus. It was discerned as the "spirit of antiChrist." After it
was cast out, my mind spontaneously generated set of memories
showing its presence throughout my life. It began in childhood,
in my cold childhood world. It was the love deflected, a force
that had yet to die into indifference.
In combating the spiritual powers that were released in me by
the vision of God, I came to rely upon certain modes of grace.
The process itself involved memory, and I made regular
confessions of my sins as they emerged. I forgave those who had
hurt me. I took regular communion, prayed with friends, and
received counsel with prayers about once or twice week. I had a
number of demons cast out of me. The process had its own
dynamic. I pursued issues as they arrived. Throughout this
period I never had the least sense of the love of God. Many
times I descended straight into hell. One night my level of
torment reached terrifying proportions. I ran down to the Church
to pray. I was feeling like a monster, and remembered how I had
wept over Mary Shelley's Frankenstein . When I got near
the Church, I felt as if I couldn't live much longer due to the
pain, a terrifying physical and spiritual anguish, physical pain
all over my body, dreadful thoughts, electrical feelings like
discharges out of my limbs, a desire to mutilate myself, and
more. Suddenly it seemed as if there was a friend with me who
would suffer in my stead. I screamed out "Put it on Jesus," and
was shocked with the intensity with which I desired that he
suffer. Instantly, the pain, all of it, vanished. On some
occasions, when I felt that I had lost my mind for good, that I
was never coming back, and that I would live this way forever, I
suddenly sensed Jesus' presence, so real, so steady, gazing at
me with a steadfast strength that overcomes the world. I came to
believe that he had descended to the depths of hell and
conquered it. Much more could be said at this point, many things
happened, my point is simple: Jesus saved me.
Throughout this period I had the most dreadful feelings toward
God. I believed with Ivan that he could do far more about the
human condition, assuming he had the authority and desire. I
went down to the Church night after night and insisted on the
answer to the matter of theodicy. Through the vulnerability of
my own spirit had I received a bit of the world's suffering
within me, and that is what ultimately had driven me so
dreadfully at Michigan State. I wanted an answer. I demanded
one. God must justify himself, or the whole thing collapses. It
seemed to me that Manicheanism was a much more accurate
description of the human conditions, with the spirit of Jesus
being the good principle. Nothing happened. Silence. The silence
lasted for months. After a while, however, I began to have some
very simple thoughts. Perhaps God was saying to me:
Rob, you have valid grounds for raising this issue. Let me
ask you something? You know that you do not see into the
mystery of my relations with anyone, whether its my fault
that they suffer, or theirs, or the devil's, or whatever.
Let us begin with ourselves, settle that and then look on
others. Do you wish to receive love from me and become
friends, and would you still desire it even if it seemed for
the present that the whole world were going to hell?
That seemed a fair question. I thought on it for sometime, and
said "yes."
Time passed on. I passed through one reality after another,
things that I had sensed for years. I never had a good day, the
best days were bad depressions. One day I had a particularly
rough day, a bad day in hell. I was reading St. John of the
Cross at the time, and noticed he claimed that God would
normally end the dark night at some point. Before I went to bed
that night I begged Jesus to stop this kind of world. That night
I had a dream. My life in story passed before me. The dream
began in my mother's fundamentalist church. Suddenly I knew I
had to get out. Jack and I got up and left. As we came out of
the church, sinister beings began to pursue us. We ran away. We
crossed some railroad tracks, and then we split up. I ran
straight, Jack went right. I never saw him again. I came to a
house, sort of like a nunnery. The nuns were friendly and said
they would put down pepper so the beings couldn't smell me. They
tracked by smell and sight. Gradually I learned it was a house
of prostitution and began to have a delicious time with the
ladies. Then I discovered they had invited the sinister beings
in the house. They were accomplices. I ran down to the basement
where I found some children playing. The evil beings came after
me but I jumped in a car and drove off at breakneck speed. Some
of the children were with me. The car had no brakes. I decided
never to slow down and drove on through traffic and stop lights.
Eventually I stopped. I came to place where I had been many
years before, so I chose to go another way. The evil beings
continued to pursue me. I ran into a hotel room. I thought I was
safe, but looking out the window, saw one of them shoot at me.
The bullet missed and hit a cross in the room. The cross
absorbed the bullet. I took off my clothes, put on some other
clothes that were draped there on a chair, and emerged on the
street. I was invisible to the sinister beings. I awoke after
the dream convinced that I would never go to hell again. This
happened in 1971. A reality that had enveloped me my whole life
had dropped away. My perceptions of the world and reality were
totally reorganized. I was free from pain. I was alive, still
alive, and we had yet to lose.
Today, 2002, many years later as I slightly revise this 1981
essay, I have never returned to the hell I once knew. I have had
ups and downs since then, but this paper has attempted to
describe a reality emerged in my life, that should have killed
me, that had its roots in my earliest childhood. It is almost
completely gone.
Mona and I had a hard time getting along. We fought a lot. We
started forgiving and asking forgiveness. That was powerful,
especially asking forgiveness, and then later we came to
fundamental decision, giving way to God with our decisions,
praying for his guidance, and submitting to each other. This was
very helpful. We quit trying to get our way, or defending
ourselves. We reached that decision in 1972. Things got much
better after that, and we have been helping each other ever
since.
I got a job in Jacksonville teaching in a high school. Mona
started a program with my cousin, the one who was getting a
Ph.D. in psychology. He had entered a hell of his own, but had
come to Florida to see what we were doing. He received the
baptism in the Holy Spirit and was healed. So he stayed. He and
Mona started a program for the blind. We all had good times
there. Ralph and his wife Nancy were living in Jacksonville as
well, and we had the most interesting discussions. Life was bit
rough at times as all of us were still a bit wrecked, but not
like before, so we had hope. I made a deep impression on the
students at the high school. I didn't say much. I became their
friend and made the effort to accept them just as they were. I
still couldn't handle adults. I found it difficult to be in the
world, often feeling like a person from another world. My
perceptions of reality had changed after going through the dark
night. I saw that people weren't ultimately selfish as I had
long believed, but a mixture of good and evil. Almost everyone
was unconscious of big blocks of what was going on in and around
them, and this leads to so much unhappiness. After the dark
night I was living in a new world and it took a while to get
adjusted. I soon learned to say little of life as I had known
it. People are afraid of God, and to many, my way of looking at
things would be incomprehensible. But I loved the students, and
we had the most happy times together. I am a natural teacher and
love having students and getting to know them.
I was still pretty tense. That summer, the summer of 1972, I
decided to confront the tension head on. I decided to spend six
or seven hours a day sitting in silence, or praying, but without
outside stimulus. Mona was working. I would sit all day on the
porch, and then do the housework just before she got home. I
found myself reflecting on two issues. The first one: "Did I
know that God existed?" I went through this from every angle I
could think of, including my understanding of such things as
positivism, mental breakdown (I had read big chunks of Laing and
Jung, as well as William James), theoretical systems (the issue
of hierarchy of categories, the lesser being an epiphenomenon of
the ultimate), the issue of solipsism, and so forth. This was
most interesting. I think I ultimately got back to the sort of
decision I had taken with respect to determinism in college.
Namely I had experienced something. It was possible to explain
it with number of theoretical systems, but ultimately the thing
itself gave itself as irreducible. Furthermore, there was still
something there, perhaps something numinous in my memory, but
almost faintly present, though qualitatively present in a
different way than trees and other things. Much more could be
said, but after that I knew that I knew. The second issue was
what to do with myself. Did I want to keep teaching high school?
I decided not, and began to wonder about going to seminary.
Friends had encouraged me, so we began the process.
Time passed quickly. Mona had a hard time sleeping, but finally
got over it. I passed my psychological exams and other
requirements and prepared for seminary. Throughout this time I
would still be thinking from time to time about the issue of
theodicy. I couldn't see any way to resolve the problem on the
basis of evidence. How could a finite amount of evidence affirm
the character of God, even if the evidence were all good, which
it isn't? God could do something entirely different tomorrow. At
one point I read some Pascal and was totally unimpressed with
his argument of wagering one's life that God existed, simply
because there was nothing to lose by such a gamble, and quite
possibly something lost if he did exist and one didn't make the
wager. To me it was quite conceivable that loving God could turn
out to be the worst course of all, a course that would lead to
heartbreak and disappointment if God were not love. It could be
that God "rewards" those who love him with a kick in the face.
Better to keep to oneself, perhaps he would respect that and
leave a person alone.
Furthermore, committing oneself to Jesus seemed qualitatively
different than committing oneself to God. At that time Jesus
seemed perfectly good to me. He had helped me, taken my
suffering, cast out my demons, taught me how to be with other
people, given me life. Yet, what about those millions who starve
to death each year? Where is Jesus then? I am certain they are
begging for mercy. Is he just a local spirit that has permeated
certain elements of western civilization? Ultimate peace and
security cannot be guaranteed without believing in an ultimate
source of power over all, and that power must be good. My sole
sense of God had been given in the vision, and what little I had
read. But I was skeptical of what I read and heard from others.
Nevertheless, after a while, certain ideas occurred to me. If
all the evidence had equal weight, then God is good and evil.
Perhaps, however, all the evidence doesn't have equal weight,
perhaps, as God originally suggested to me, some of the evidence
belongs to human sin, the devil, or whatever. Where then is the
decisive evidence? If that evidence is Jesus, if he is the Son
of God, the image of the Father, then God is good since I knew
that Jesus was good. After I cried out, "Put it on Jesus," and
my suffering vanished, I had come to love him. Therefore, the
theodicy question, in my mind at least, hung on the question of
the divinity of Christ. If he were God's true Son, the one who
reveals God's real character, then God is good like Jesus. Just
before we left for seminary I sat on the couch with Mona and
prayed one of the most earnest prayers of my life. I had to know
one way or another about the divinity of Christ. It was an issue
that mattered. I had become convinced through the new
perceptions given after the dark night, that people's behavior,
society, and the course of history were shaped by spiritual
powers. If God is good and the ultimate actor in history, then
all is well. If not, there is no hope. After the dark night I
could not be a humanist.
I arrived at seminary with a number of basic questions. After
reading William James, I knew I was a particular spiritual type
which has always existed. I wanted to know how much of what had
happened to me was a result of my particular psychological
disposition, or does the Gospel offer everyone a qualitatively
different life, and were there limits to it? I was especially
interested in the grounds of revelation, epistemology,
particularly the issue of whether revelation is given apart from
sense impressions. I wanted to know the nature of God's action
to the world, miracles, and in what sense the Kingdom of Heaven
could be said to exist. I also hoped for some direction on how
to proceed in regard to social, economic, and political matters.
Finally, I wanted to develop a systematic theology. These were
the basic issues and I worked hard on them the whole time I was
there. I made some headway. This is not the place to go into
description of my thinking at seminary. I will say only a few
things.
The foremost impression, gained from the entire scope of
seminary education, was that the aim of the Christian gospel is
to offer salvation through Jesus Christ. Salvation is
restoration of shalom. It is wholeness, health, sanity,
full relations with God and others. I came to the conclusion
that salvation is impossible within the limits of human life,
that grace is required for human life to be reconstituted.
Conceptually, the primary obstacle to believing in grace is the
deterministic spirit found in certain modern concepts of
causality. I have investigated this matter for several years and
feel that modern theology and biblical hermeneutics have been
hamstrung by not being open to what James calls "crass
supernaturalism." That is, God can act beyond the normal
observed course of events. So many theologians I have read have
failed to affirm the miraculous power of God. All of them affirm
that miracles do not prove divinity. I agree. God could redeem
Berkeley tomorrow, and that would still leave millions in abject
misery. Yet these theologians fail to emphasize that God is
love, that Jesus is love, and that we are foolish to set limits
on this love by failing to affirm the possibility of miracles in
our own time. As far as I am concerned I am alive because of
miracle, and I have observed that the preaching of the early
Church was victorious because it affirmed the grace of God and
power to do something about the human condition. There is
overwhelming evidence for this affirmation.
Secondly, the Enlightenment was just that enlightenment. I
suspect, and this is a hypothesize which explains many things to
me, that this enlightenment was the creation of a particular
form of consciousness. I developed an enlightened consciousness
by the age of fourteen. It is observational, descriptive, and
manipulative. It is not the only way of looking at the world.
Prior to the scientific revolution and the Enlightenment, many
people didn't experience the world that way. The later years of
my life manifested a breakdown in that form of consciousness.
Even so, a great deal of theology and biblical studies are
carried out in the spirit of the Enlightenment. From what I can
tell, enlightenment consciousness focuses the personal energy of
the self in one area, the mind, behind the eyes, rational.
Scripture cannot be understood fully from that perspective.
Succinctly put, Scripture does not need to be completely
demythologized, we need to be remythologized. That Scripture was
written by fallible human beings was obvious to me. But the core
of Jesus' teaching, the rough events of his life, and his power
over evil, these are all essential for salvation, and can be
verified today by people who take them seriously and start
praying with and for each other. Not to believe that the gist of
the biblical events is at least possible, is in my mind, to
limit the possibility of salvation. New Testament studies and
theology have failed in my opinion, to make that affirmation
strongly enough. I say this only for the sake of those who
suffer. Everyone suffers.
One of the most interesting books I read in seminary was Arnold
Come's Human Spirit, Holy Spirit. This is an outstanding
book. In it he links revelation to sense impressions. God spoke
through incarnation. I found a similar idea in Eliade's concept
of hieraphony. This sheds light on a number of things. I saw
that my original vision of God and the glimpses of Jesus were
not accidental. They were manifestations through memory, but
memory conditioned in a certain way. In the case of the vision,
it was the hell fire and brimstone God of my mother's Church, my
father's stern Calvinism, and the general violence of life as I
had known it. Therefore the vision had only relative
significance. Its real impact was the cleansing of myself.
[Since 1981, when this was first written, I have changed my mind
a bit on this matter. I now think I received the baptism of the
Holy Spirit and fire. The fire cleansed me, illuminating my soul
in depth so I could repent and be delivered. God appeared as
fire because I was utterly in sin and opposed to his will. In
fact, I hated him.]
The visions of Jesus were effects of Christ's presence given
through the laying on of hands for inner healing wherein the
destructive processes of my life were interwoven through verbal
prayer with the historical events of Jesus' life. It is actually
a form of contemplation, but many sufferers don't have the
capacity for contemplation and need help. The appearance of
Jesus coincided with those dimensions of my existence where evil
reigned, and which had been given to Jesus in prayer. This
redemptive process was no accident, happening out of the sky,
but rather it was the result of a Christian community seriously
responding to ministry in the name of Jesus, and refusing to
acknowledge anyone as a hopeless case.
A second interesting idea I encountered in seminary was Otto's
idea of Holy. This laid the foundation for an epistemological
solution, and helped found many of the ideas I had mulled over
while sitting out on the porch and thinking about God's
existence. More could be said. [Have also changed my views here,
thanks to Barth and orthodoxy.]
Before and during seminary, except for the sense of the presence
of Jesus in 1970, and a few other times, I lived in what certain
mystics call aridity. I never felt the love of God, and when
turning my eyes inward, I perceived an inner wasteland. This was
my inner world leveled after the dark night. Nevertheless, I
seemed to function very well and progressed rapidly in my
ability to love other people and enjoy life. Right after my
arrival at Virginia in 1973, I was elected president of my
class, and later president of the student body. I had very good
friends there, really liked most of my professors, and enjoyed
my studies. I wasn't really ready to be student body president,
and if I had was given the choice again, I would not have done
it. As student body president I had some responsibility for our
communal life. That caused me some trouble. It was so difficult
to reconcile the reality of the gospel as I was learning it to
the facts of our communal life. That was tough, but Mona and I
survived and did well.
One of the most exciting adventures was the investigation into
the historical Jesus. I took reading course on my own to
investigate the gospels more thoroughly. After seminary, I read
Sweitzer' Quest for the Historical Jesus. I also read C.H.
Dodd and others and was deeply moved by the portrayal of Jesus
as one who held apocalyptic beliefs. I discovered that this
apocalyptic mentality is not unique. It characterizes a peculiar
form of mental breakdown as discussed in Antoine Boison's
Exploration of the Inner World: Study of Mental Disorder and
Religious Experience. I concluded, however, that there is a
vast difference between Jesus and a street crazy. Jesus
perceived fully the reality of evil, but he conquered it, day
after day, in his own person through temptation, teaching,
healing and exorcism. This ministry gave him the real
experiential basis for believing the Kingdom was imminent. The
crazies know no peace. Jesus was and is peace.
Part way through my middler year a number of things began to
come together. I began to see the sweep of biblical and church
history written large. I was especially interested in the Old
Testament prophets and their wrathful God who would consume all
wickedness by fire. I began to see that this was only a partial
revelation. The whole sweep of theological education centered on
Jesus Christ as the Son of God and image of the Father. I
concluded that the final revelation of the truth of this
statement could only be verified on some final eschatological
day, but in the meantime, one could chose whether or not to
abandon oneself to God as revealed in Jesus. One can chose to
believe. My believing doesn't make it ultimately true, but it
does commit me to give my heart away to God as revealed in the
dynamics of the Spirit. That is faith. Purely empirical sight is
not given to us. Given empirical facts, the world as it is, I
cannot see how one can affirm that God is good. But there is
more to it than that. While at seminary I sometimes sensed a
terrible suffering all around me. This was something more than
suffering humanity. When we got to the prophet Hosea, I saw that
God suffered for Israel. I saw that the "lamb slain from the
foundation of the world" is a symbol for the eternal suffering
of God. I began to see that God suffers because Jesus suffered
on the cross. I felt the suffering of God. As I was sensing
this, I saw so clearly why Jesus must be the Son of God, the
revelation of God's character. If he is God's Son, then God is
as Jesus. He suffers for us and with us as on the cross, but
suffering is not the final word. By resurrection from the dead,
God in Jesus Christ has overcome suffering. The final word is
joy. This joy is nearly indescribable. These illuminations came
to me with striking intensity. For the first time in my life, I
began to sense the love that exists within the cosmos. I
remember one day especially. I was driving home from Washington
D.C. on the Interstate, only miles from where a few years before
I experienced the worst vision of apocalypse. All around me the
world was transformed into beauty and joy, not just sorrow as it
had always been, but love conquering sorrow, love giving life,
and love making friends of us all. I experienced this with the
greatest intensity at the celebration of the Holy Eucharist with
the seminary community. It seemed at times as if we had entered
heaven, sat down together, and shared in the messianic banquet
of the Lamb. After that, I knew that God was love, and felt for
the first time in my life, a degree of peace at being in the
universe.
Not long after this I had a dream. I was standing on a small
hill, looking at a mountain. A landslide had opened the
mountain, and inside, it blazed with hot molten rock. I needed
to walk to the far side of the mountain. The only way forward
passed by the mountain, so close I knew I would be destroyed.
But I had to go forward, just as time bears us on. I went
forward, expecting to die. As I went forward someone went with
me and I passed the mountain unharmed. I knew it was Jesus who
had placed his cross between my sin and the cleansing wrath of
God that I had seen in the vision of God as fire. I had this
dream not long after sensing the love of God, and particularly,
after reflecting upon and studying the Pauline doctrine of
justification. One of my professors, FitzSimmons Allison, is the
one whose teaching enabled me to see this. I cannot thank him
enough. Ultimately, justice reigns in the universe, but without
the sacrifice of Christ, I would have been doomed.
Since then life has been fairly mundane. The first year in the
ministry was difficult, but once I learned what I could do and
started doing that, it became fun. I was the rector of an
English speaking congregation in Guatemala for two years. We had
a good time and progressed to some degree in the Christian
faith. All sorts of people were in that parish and it had a very
good spirit. I especially enjoyed preaching, teaching, and being
with people. For quite some time I had been thinking about
further work in theology and spirituality. I suspected my
thought and experience can have some relevance to contemporary
theology.
Just before I left Guatemala one of my agnostic friends said he
would come to church if I would witness to God's work in my
life. He said witness meant facts, and as an engineer, he
accepted facts. I am not in the habit of talking about myself,
so people there didn't know much about me. But, after two years,
they had grown to trust and love me. So I witnessed on a Sunday,
a milder version of what is in this paper. I addressed myself to
two issues: concrete acts of God's love, and the question of
theodicy. Many of the people thought it was the most dramatic
and wonderful thing they had ever heard. They got happy and
excited. I was surprised. We had good time there and I was sorry
to leave.
While at seminary I didn't have time to gain much insight into
one issue that concerned me, the matter of transforming society,
or the Christian's work in the political and social world. My
best advancement was to do field work at the Church of the
Savior in downtown Washington. This remarkable and innovative
church has combined catholic spirituality and social concern in
order to improve the quality of people's lives in the
Washington, D.C. area. I have thought of looking at social
concern in the light of apocalyptic thought. I would also like
to look at spirituality in that light, and feel I need to take
some spirituality courses here at GNU. I have done some reading
in this area, St. John of the Cross was very helpful to me at
one point, but I know very little. My ultimate objective is to
formalize a message of God's love and communicate it effectively
to people.
One problem with that objective is that Christian affirmations
such as "Jesus loves you" have lost their power. I have often
thought of writing a novel to show the relevance of the basic
Christian affirmations in the context of a personal and social
history. [I did it.] That would have power, and it would also
provide a good springboard for raising significant theological
and spiritual issues. A number of issues have occurred to me in
the course of this paper.
One matter that interests me that I forgot to mention is the
matter of religion and psychology. While in Clinical Pastoral
Education, I came to suspect that the methods used by
psychology, and by the Church in its pastoral counseling, were
quite ineffective compared to the methods I learned in Ocala.
Exorcism with counseling is very effective, but counseling or
therapy alone is less so. I have thought about this quite a bit
and once wrote a paper arguing that the methods of pastoral
counseling cannot be simply borrowed from psychology, but must
reflect in some way the source of grace. Secondly, I really
believe that numerous breakdowns are symptomatic expressions of
a neurotic relationship to God, and to tell a person that the
trouble is their inter personal relationships or their
upbringing is only half the truth. Some go mad before God
because they are without God.
Finally, my theological interest and direction may not be in
your field of interest, if so, please let me know and steer me
as you see fit toward those who can best enhance my potential.
Your concern and advice is appreciated. This has been my best
course and I have enjoyed it immensely. Thank you.
The Rev. Robert J. Sanders, Ph.D.
home